Date:2026-07-13

The 23rd Session of the Standing Committee of the 14th National People’s Congress voted to adopt the newly revised Trademark Law on June 26, which shall come into force on January 1, 2027.

As a core component of intellectual property rights, trademarks are not only carriers of commercial reputation and symbols of integrity, but also vital tools for enterprises to compete in the market. How does the newly revised Trademark Law address emerging challenges plaguing industrial development and better safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of market operators and consumers? Reporters with Xinhua Insight interviewed relevant experts and scholars for answers.

 

Highlight 1: Crack Down on Deceptive Trademarks to Protect Consumer Rights

 

In recent years, deceptive trademarks have misled countless consumers into bad purchases. Examples include chargers labeled “120W” that fail to deliver the claimed power output, and dried noodles advertised as “handmade” yet mass-produced by machinery. Official data shows that since 2023, the China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA) has rejected 1.273 million applications for deceptive trademarks prone to misleading consumers.
“A trademark exists to identify the source of goods and services; it cannot be deliberately pieced together or split to function as covert false advertising,” said Guan Yuying, Research Fellow at the Institute of Law, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences. The latest revision is problem-oriented and responds promptly to public concerns, helping further refine the trademark regime and curb abuses of trademark rights.
The existing Trademark Law explicitly stipulates that signs deceptive enough to mislead the public regarding product quality, origin or other characteristics shall not be used as trademarks. In practice, however, most deceptive conduct occurs after trademark registration during product circulation, leaving administrative authorities slow to detect violations and hampering timely law enforcement.
The revised law strengthens consumer protection in two ways: first, it imposes harsher penalties on the use of registered trademarks to mislead the public; second, it introduces a complaint and reporting mechanism, granting all entities and individuals the right to report such illegal acts to trademark administration and law enforcement authorities.

“The newly revised Trademark Law organically integrates public oversight with administrative supervision. It cuts consumers’ costs of rights protection, improves trademark examination standards at the source, and prevents unqualified trademarks from entering the market,” commented Ma Yide, Dean of the School of Intellectual Property, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences.

 

Highlight 2: Curb Malicious Trademark Registration and Standardize Trademark Use

 

China has grown into a major trademark power. By the end of 2025, the number of valid registered trademarks nationwide (excluding Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan) reached 49.877 million. Meanwhile, malicious trademark registrations remain rampant, with over 200,000 such cases investigated nationwide in the first half of both 2023 and 2024.
Du Ying, Professor at the Law School, Central University of Finance and Economics, noted that hot buzzwords and celebrity names are frequently subject to malicious squatting. Practices such as trademark hoarding, free-riding on established brands, and capitalizing on trending topics disrupt market order and severely hinder the development of domestic brands.
Targeting the long-standing issue of “prioritizing registration over genuine use”, the revision adds clear provisions: trademark applications filed “without intent for commercial use and far exceeding an enterprise’s normal production and operational needs” shall be rejected. It also specifies scenarios constituting malicious trademark registration, and clarifies that law enforcement authorities may issue warnings and impose fines of up to RMB 100,000 if such acts generate adverse social impacts.
Mass quantities of hoarded trademarks sit idle for years, wasting administrative resources and becoming tools for abusive litigation and market disruption. The revised law reinforces the trademark exit mechanism, authorizing the national trademark administration department to revoke registered trademarks that have become generic terms or have not been put to genuine use without justifiable reasons for three consecutive years.

“Trademarks are functional commercial assets, not collectibles. Their value stems from goodwill accumulated through market application, not merely registration certificates,” Ma Yide stated. Moving forward, the regulatory framework will further embed the principle of “balancing registration and use”, strengthen reviews of actual trademark utilization, shrink profit margins for trademark hoarding, and channel trademark resources toward genuine business operations.

 

Highlight 3: Tighten Regulation of Trademark Agency Misconduct and Boost Industry Self-Discipline

 

Unregulated competition has plagued the trademark agency sector in recent years. Many agencies participate in or assist clients with malicious squatting, hoarding and resale of trademarks, with constantly evolving illegal tactics forming underground industrial chains.

 

“Regulating the trademark agency market is challenging due to uneven practitioner qualifications and incomplete industry self-governance rules. Effective legal remedies for this sector’s irregularities were a key focus of the revision,” Guan Yuying explained.

 

To address these issues, the updated Trademark Law enhances filing supervision over trademark agencies and their practitioners, and adds provisions defining the roles and functions of trademark agency industry organizations.

 

The revised statute clarifies that trademark agency industry organizations are self-regulatory bodies of the sector. They shall strengthen industry self-discipline, formulate self-governance codes and disciplinary rules, deliver professional training together with ethics and practice discipline education, guide members to conduct trademark agency services in compliance with laws, continuously upgrade industry service standards, and impose sanctions on members violating self-regulatory norms.

 

“As a valuable complement to government supervision, industry self-regulation leverages the professional expertise and self-management capacity of trade bodies, fostering a mutually reinforcing dynamic between administrative oversight and industry self-governance,” Du Ying said.

 

Highlight 4: Strengthen Protection of Well-Known Trademarks to Support Enterprises Going Global

 

Luckin Coffee trademarks were squatted in Thailand, while time-honored brands Shaoxing Huadiao Wine and Daughter Red faced malicious overseas registration in Japan. As more Chinese enterprises expand globally, certain trademark agencies facilitate or carry out malicious overseas squatting, hindering Chinese brands’ international layout.

 

The revised Trademark Law stipulates that where proof of a trademark’s renown among relevant domestic audiences is required during overseas trademark examination, review or dispute settlement procedures, the national trademark administration department may, upon parties’ requests, confirm the trademark’s well-known status in accordance with relevant provisions.

 

“This provision will to some extent curb malicious overseas squatting of Chinese time-honored and reputable brands. It also enables Chinese enterprises to secure well-known trademark protection when facing squatting and infringement abroad, delivering institutional support for Chinese firms’ global expansion,” Du Ying elaborated.

Furthermore, the revision standardizes cross-border trademark agency practices and tightens supervision over fraudulent and improper conduct in handling overseas trademark matters, stopping the spillover of malicious squatting and irregular agency activities to foreign jurisdictions.

 

“The trademark system protects commercial goodwill built through authentic business operations, not mere preemptive registration. This safeguards brand value accumulated by enterprises over decades and prevents unfair free-riding by third parties,” Ma Yide remarked.

 

Experts advise enterprises to uphold the “trademark-first” strategy when venturing overseas. Prior to entering foreign markets, companies should complete international trademark layout and registration applications as early as possible, combining legal safeguards with commercial strategies to mitigate the risk of overseas trademark squatting.(Liu Zhen, Reporter of Xinhua Insight, Xinhua News Agency)

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Source: Xinhuanet